HI~

Post Info TOPIC: [E] Zoos serve no practical function.
Anonymous

Date:
[E] Zoos serve no practical function.
Permalink   
 


Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Zoos serve no practical function. Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer.


Today governments around world have spent a fortune developing zoological park. I fully support this idea. This is because Zoos are an important part in that it has positive influences on both animal and human.


First of all, Zoos play a significant role in educating people about animals. With destructing natural habit, there is no space to accommodate animal. As a result, people don't know about animals except for reading books. Zoological Park provides people with a hands-on experience watching animals up close, attentively listening to their sound, and carefully touching them.From my personal experience, I went to Seoul children’s park when I was in elementary school. I got active hands-on experience by looking at them at close distance. So it helped me understand easily animal kingdom in biology class in middle school.


What's more, Zoological Park has protected endangered species. That is, Zoos provide animals with optimal conditions for survival, including natural habitats, nutritious diet, and medical treatment. They are trying to accommodate animals that might be vanishing from wild. For instance, the number of tigers in Korea is rapidly decreasing because of pouch and habitats destruction. They are on the verge of extinction, so that Zoos are combining effort to save tigers with nutritionist and zoologist to keep the animals healthy and encourage them to breed.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that Zoos have practical function. The reasoning behind this is that it allows people to educate effectively and animals to live in a good condition. All in all I think zoos help open the door for people to understand and love animals on a deeper level.



-- Edited by Hanul on Sunday 5th of September 2010 12:11:30 PM

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 203
Date:
RE: Zoos serve no practical function.
Permalink   
 


Today governments around world have spent a fortune developing zoological park. I fully support this idea. This is because Zoos are an important part in that it has positive influences on both animal and human.


First of all, Zoos play a significant role in educating people about animals. With destructing natural habitat, there is no space to accommodate animal. As a result, people don't know about animals except from(for) reading books. Zoological Park provides people with a hands-on experience watching animals up close, attentively listening to their sound, and carefully touching them.From my personal experience, I went to Seoul children’s park when I was in elementary school. I got (active) hands-on experience by looking at them at close distance. So it helped me understand easily animal kingdom in biology class in middle school.


What's more, Zoological Park has protected endangered species. That is, Zoos provide animals with optimal conditions for survival, including natural habitats, nutritious diet, and medical treatment. They are trying to accommodate animals that might be vanishing from wild. For instance, the number of tigers in Korea is rapidly decreasing because of pouch and habitats destruction. They are on the verge of extinction, so (that) Zoos are combining effort to save tigers with nutritionist and zoologist to keep the animals healthy and encourage them to breed.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that Zoos have practical function. The reasoning behind this is that it allows people to educate effectively and animals to live in a good condition. All in all I think zoos help open the door for people to understand and love animals on a deeper level.

밑에주소에서는 except from이 맞지않다고 하고있음 , except와 except for 의 차이가 나옴



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard